Study Reveals Illegal Provisions in Nursing Home Admission Contracts

Dan Frith
Dan Frith
Contributor
Posted by Dan FrithDecember 22, 2007 6:11 AM

The National Senior Citizens Law Center (NSCLC) this week released a report entitled, Think Twice Before Signing: Improper and Unfair Provisions in Missouri Nursing Home Admission Agreements. The report summarizes the results of a study of admission agreements from 175 Missouri nursing facilities. Although focused on nursing homes in Missouri, we have seen these very same issues in our cases in Virginia, West Virginia, and Tennessee.

The study found that 25 percent of the admission agreements contained at least one provision designed to lower the expectation of residents and their families about the care they would receive. One admission agreement, for example, said that its services were "not designed to somehow protect the resident from everyday, normal risks and responsibilities of living, including ... situations such as falling, choking and weight loss and/or dehydration." In a similar vein, another agreement made it clear that an inadequate level of care would be the problem of the resident and family, rather than the facility:

Resident/Representative further understands and agrees that if they believe that the Resident is not receiving the level of care which meets their expectation, the Resident/Representative has the right to either pay for additional care through the use of private-duty personnel or to remove the Resident from the Facility and place the Resident in another health care setting, which the Resident/Representative believes would be more suitable to the Resident's needs.

Other illegal provisions and their prevalence:

o 62 percent of the admission agreements waived to some extent a nursing facility's legal responsibility for a resident's personal injury.
o 74 percent of the admission agreements waived some of a nursing facility's liability for a resident's lost or stolen personal property.
o 51 percent of the admission agreements either required a financial guarantee of a family member or friend, or solicited a supposedly "voluntary" guarantee.
o 17 percent of the admission agreements allowed involuntary transfer/discharge at the facility's discretion.

Each such provision is contrary to the federal law's requirement that a nursing facility meet a resident's needs and assist residents as appropriate with activities of daily living. Know your rights under the law.


0 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Roanoke

InjuryBoard Roanoke RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address

Related Links